Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with a Peroneus Longus Tendon Graft

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63403/re.v33i1.474

Keywords:

Peroneus longus tendon, Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Return to sport, Functional evaluation

Abstract

Introduction: the peroneus longus tendon (PLT) has emerged as an alternative graft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, supported by evidence demonstrating its strength, adequate diameter, and low donor-site morbidity. Reported outcomes are comparable to traditional grafts, with preserved joint stability and favorable functional scores. However, there remains a need to integrate ankle and knee functional assessment during the first postoperative year, considering the biomechanical relationship between both joints and their relevance in return-to-sport decisions.

Objective: was to present our experience using the PLT as a graft for ACL reconstruction, evaluating donor-site morbidity and the functional evolution of the ankle and knee at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

Materials and methods: a prospective case series was conducted including 86 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between June 2023 and November 2025 using autologous PLT grafts. Ankle function was assessed with AOFAS and FADI scores at 3, 6, and 12 months. In patients completing 12-month follow-up, IKDC, Tegner, and ACL-RSI scores were additionally recorded to evaluate knee function and return-to-sport readiness. Patients with chronic ankle instability or clinical flatfoot on the graft-harvest side were excluded.

Results: a total of 47 patients (37 males, 10 females) were analyzed, with a mean age of 31.19 ± 11.64 years. The mean graft diameter was 8.68 ± 0.61 mm. Mean graft length was 262.5 ± 4.24 mm in women and 269.72 ± 7.30 mm in men. At 3 months, mean AOFAS and FADI scores were 89.10 ± 10.13 and 87.95 ± 11.27, respectively. At 6 months, scores improved to 96.53 ± 6.64 and 98.84 ± 3.83, respectively. At 12 months, AOFAS reached 98.36 ± 3.79 and FADI 98.29 ± 4.24. Among patients with one-year follow-up, IKDC averaged 93.4 ± 10.4, Tegner 95.76 ± 7.67, and ACL-RSI 91.87 ± 10.39.

Conclusion: the PLT demonstrated safety and efficacy as an autograft for ACL reconstruction, showing low donor-site morbidity and excellent ankle functional recovery. Twelve-month outcomes confirmed a sustained favorable evolution, supporting its use in both primary and revision ACL reconstructions.

Level of evidence: IV. Retrospective cohort study

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kartus J, Movin T, Karlsson J. Donor-site morbidity and anterior knee problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autografts. Arthroscopy. 2001;17(9):971-80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1053/jars.2001.28979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/jars.2001.28979

Butt UM, Khan ZA, Amin A, Shah IA, Iqbal J, Khan Z. Peroneus Longus Tendon Harvesting for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2022;12(2):e20.00053. doi: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.20.00053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.20.00053

Shi FD, Hess DE, Zuo JZ, et al. Peroneus Longus Tendon Autograft is a Safe and Effective Alternative for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2019;32(8):804-811. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1669951.

Saeed UB, AwanJ, ManzoorB. Comparison of double Peroneus Longuswith Quadrupled Hamstring in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. J Pak Orthop Assoc 2021;33(4):145-151.

Quinn M, Byrne RA, Albright JA, et al. Peroneus Longus Tendon Autograft May Present a Viable Alternative for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2024;40(4):1366-1376.e1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2023.10.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2023.10.016

Hossain GMJ, Islam MS, Rahman Khan MM, et al. A prospective study of arthroscopic primary ACL reconstruction with ipsilateral peroneus longus tendon graft: Experience of 439 cases. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102(9):e32943. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032943. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032943

Baawa-Ameyaw J, Plastow R, Begum FA, Kayani B, Jeddy H, Haddad F. Current concepts in graft selection for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. EFORT Open Rev. 2021;6(9):808-815. doi: https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.6.210023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.6.210023

Joshi S, Shetty UC, Salim MD, Meena N, Kumar RS, Rao VKV. Peroneus Longus Tendon Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Safe and Effective Alternative in Nonathletic Patients. Niger J Surg. 2021;27(1):42-47. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/njs.NJS_22_20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/njs.NJS_22_20

He J, Tang Q, Ernst S, et al. Peroneus longus tendon autograft has functional outcomes comparable to hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(9):2869-2879. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06279-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06279-9

Cakar A, Kose O, Selcuk H, Egerci OF, Tasatan E, Dogruoz F. Complications of peroneus longus tendon harvesting: a retrospective review of 82 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023;143(11):6675-6684. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04988-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04988-7

Shi FD, Hess DE, Zuo JZ, et al. Peroneus Longus Tendon Autograft is a Safe and Effective Alternative for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2019;32(8):804-811. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1669951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1669951

Gök B, Kanar M, Tutak Y. Peroneus Longus vs Hamstring Tendon Autografts in ACL Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of 106 Patients' Outcomes. Med Sci Monit. 2024;30:e945626. doi: https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.945626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.945626

Nguyen Hoang Q, Nguyen Manh K. Anatomical and Biomechanical Characteristics of Peroneus Longus Tendon: Applications in Knee Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery. Adv Orthop. 2023:2018363. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2018363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2018363

Soleymanha M, Soleymani Nejad A, Keyhani S, Vosoughi F, LaPrade RF, Tollefson LV. Peroneus longus tendon harvest for ACL reconstruction yields good functional outcome of the ankle: A systematic review and meta-Analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Sep 30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.70079. Epub ahead of print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.70079

Sherman OH, Banffy MB. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: which graft is best? Arthroscopy. 2004;20(9):974-80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2004.08.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-8063(04)00842-4

Published

2026-04-01

How to Cite

1.
Segura FM, Segura FP, Segura FV, Lucero Zudaire MP, Gatica F, Landaburu F. Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with a Peroneus Longus Tendon Graft. RELART [Internet]. 2026 Apr. 1 [cited 2026 Apr. 16];33(1):25-34. Available from: https://www.revistarelart.com/index.php/revista/article/view/474

Issue

Section

Original article